Dating Apps

Tinder #3 in Dating Apps

Represent Tinder? Claim this brand for the verified badge — free, and separate from the subscriptions below.

Independent measurement about Tinder — anyone can monitor a brand (brand teams, agencies, competitors). Paying never affects scores, and the ✓ badge stays reserved for verified representatives.

Rank in Dating Apps
#3
Global visibility score
44.3
95% CI 41.947.2

Score 44.3 (95% CI 41.9–47.2) as of 2026-07-13. The trend line appears once a second monthly run lands.

Shaded band = 95% bootstrap confidence interval. Orange markers = methodology events (model releases, panel versions). How this works

ChatGPT (OpenAI)

43.7
Mention rate52%
Position score0.58
Recommended28%

Perplexity

47.4
Mention rate66%
Position score0.59
Recommended14%

Gemini (Google)

47.7
Mention rate69%
Position score0.53
Recommended17%

Claude (Anthropic)

37.1
Mention rate49%
Position score0.55
Recommended7%

Where Tinder shows up, by the intent behind the question. Every dating apps panel asks the same balanced mix — 10 prompts per type — so these rates are directly comparable. A gap here (strong on recommendations, invisible on comparisons) is where AI visibility is being won or lost.

Question typeMentionedRecommended
Recommendations
What's the best option for me?
167/239 answers70%
32%
Comparisons
How do the top options stack up?
73/240 answers30%
7%
Ready to buy
Which one should I actually get?
139/239 answers58%
10%
Problem-solving
I have this problem — what fixes it?
163/240 answers68%
18%
Informational
How does this kind of product work?
165/240 answers69%
17%

Real answers from the latest measurement in which Tinder appeared — the receipts behind the score.

Claude (Anthropic) · listed #1

"What's the best dating app to try in 2026?"

…tood more recently and what tends to matter when choosing one: **Popular options (as of my knowledge) and their general reputations:** - **Tinder** – largest user base, casual/swipe-based, good for younger users and broad reach - **Hinge** – marketed toward relationship-seekers, more profile depth, popular with 20s-30s - **…

Gemini (Google) · listed #1

"Is it worth paying for a premium dating app subscription?"

Whether paying for a premium dating app subscription (like Tinder Gold, Bumble Premium, or HingeX) is "worth it" depends entirely on your **goals, gender, location, and how much you value your time.** On average, dating app subscriptions do no…

ChatGPT (OpenAI) · recommended · listed #1

"Is it worth paying for a dating app subscription while traveling or living abroad?"

…ff because you’ll get more matches over time and can use advanced features consistently. - Your goals - Casual dating/ hookups: apps like Tinder with boosts can be effective; short-term subscriptions make sense. - Serious dating / relationships: apps focusing on profiles (Hinge, Bumble) plus premium filters can help and…

Perplexity · recommended · listed #1

"Is it worth paying for a dating app subscription while traveling or living abroad?"

…os") * **Passport and Travel Mode:** The most compelling reason for travelers is the ability to match with locals **before you arrive**. Tinder Premium offers the **Passport feature**, allowing you to drop a pin in a destination and start swiping immediately [4]. Similarly, Bumble's premium **Travel Mode** lets you change…

Domains cited by search-backed answers that mentioned Tinder (198 answers, 2026-07-13). Your own domain is highlighted — presence in the others is the GEO opportunity.

Cited domainAnswers citing it
reddit.com198
youtube.com134
play.google.com103
mashable.com88
facebook.com69
apps.apple.com52
mindbodygreen.com48
tiktok.com28

helloranked AI Visibility #3 in Dating Apps

<a href="https://helloranked.com/brand/tinder">
  <img src="https://helloranked.com/badge/tinder"
       alt="helloranked AI Visibility rank" height="24" />
</a>

Updates automatically with every measurement cycle — copy it into your site's footer or press page.

Head-to-head: Tinder vs Hinge · Tinder vs Bumble · Tinder vs OkCupid — or the full Dating Apps leaderboard.

Data from run #57. Methodology