Dating Apps

Hinge #1 in Dating Apps

Represent Hinge? Claim this brand for the verified badge — free, and separate from the subscriptions below.

Independent measurement about Hinge — anyone can monitor a brand (brand teams, agencies, competitors). Paying never affects scores, and the ✓ badge stays reserved for verified representatives.

Rank in Dating Apps
#1
Global visibility score
52.9 ▽ −2.3
95% CI 50.355.5
025507510052.9±2.607-1308-01

Shaded band = 95% bootstrap confidence interval. Orange markers = methodology events (model releases, panel versions). How this works

ChatGPT (OpenAI)

51.2
Mention rate62%
Position score0.57
Recommended44%

Claude (Anthropic)

46.5
Mention rate57%
Position score0.63
Recommended26%

Gemini (Google)

62.2
Mention rate75%
Position score0.66
Recommended60%

Perplexity

47.0
Mention rate50%
Position score0.69
Recommended37%

Where Hinge shows up, by the intent behind the question. Every dating apps panel asks the same balanced mix — 10 prompts per type — so these rates are directly comparable. A gap here (strong on recommendations, invisible on comparisons) is where AI visibility is being won or lost.

Question typeMentionedRecommended
Recommendations
What's the best option for me?
162/240 answers68%
58%
Comparisons
How do the top options stack up?
91/240 answers38%
23%
Ready to buy
Which one should I actually get?
159/240 answers66%
50%
Problem-solving
I have this problem — what fixes it?
172/240 answers72%
48%
Informational
How does this kind of product work?
149/240 answers62%
28%

Real answers from the latest measurement in which Hinge appeared — the receipts behind the score.

Claude (Anthropic) · recommended · listed #1

"If I'm going to pay for a dating app, which one is worth the money for serious dating?"

…e, location, and what you mean by serious. Here's a realistic breakdown: **Generally considered stronger for serious relationships:** - **Hinge** — Designed around "meant to be deleted," more prompts and profile depth than swipe-only apps, tends to attract people looking for relationships rather than casual hookups. Proba…

Gemini (Google) · recommended · listed #1

"Which paid dating app plan is worth it for serious relationships in India?"

…cs, and success rates in India, here is the breakdown of which paid plans are actually worth your money. --- ### 1. The Overall Winner: **Hinge (Hinge+)** If you live in a Tier 1 city (Mumbai, Delhi-NCR, Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai) and are in your mid-20s to mid-30s, **Hinge is currently the best app for serious…

ChatGPT (OpenAI) · listed #1

"Between Bumble and Hinge, which one would you say is better?"

Short answer: Neither is strictly “better” — it depends on what you want. Quick comparison to help you choose - Intent/audience - Hinge: Built and marketed around relationships (“designed to be deleted”). Tends to attract people who want something more serious or at least a real date. - Bumble: More mixed — dati…

Perplexity · recommended · listed #1

"Which paid dating app plan is worth it for serious relationships in India?"

For **serious relationships in India**, the paid plan most often worth considering is **Hinge+ / HingeX** if you want the best mix of relationship intent, profile depth, and usable premium features.[1][3][11] If your goal is closer to **marriage-minded** dating, **Aisle’s…

Domains cited by search-backed answers that mentioned Hinge (150 answers, 2026-08-01). Your own domain is highlighted — presence in the others is the GEO opportunity.

Cited domainAnswers citing it
reddit.com150
youtube.com111
play.google.com90
mashable.com81
mindbodygreen.com76
datingadvice.com66
datingnews.com56
apps.apple.com56

helloranked AI Visibility #1 in Dating Apps

<a href="https://helloranked.com/brand/hinge">
  <img src="https://helloranked.com/badge/hinge"
       alt="helloranked AI Visibility rank" height="24" />
</a>

Updates automatically with every measurement cycle — copy it into your site's footer or press page.

Head-to-head: Hinge vs Bumble · Hinge vs Tinder · Hinge vs OkCupid — or the full Dating Apps leaderboard.

Data from run #88. Methodology